The Trump administration’s pressure to eliminate diversity, equity, and inclusion practices from K-12 schools in the United States has not gone unnoticed. In a bold move, New Jersey’s Education Commissioner Kevin Dehmer has declared that the state will not certify to the U.S. Department of Education that it has ended DEI programs the federal government considers illegal under civil rights laws. This decision has significant implications for the state’s public school system, as well as other districts across the country.
The State of New Jersey’s Stance
In a letter to the administration, Dehmer stated that the state already complies with civil rights laws without the need for certification. He emphasized that the state’s DEI programs are based on a commitment to empowering all students to realize their full potential.
- Dehmer’s letter highlighted that the state has a long history of supporting DEI initiatives, and that the programs are an integral part of the state’s education system.
- The commissioner also pointed out that the state has certified its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race or shared ancestry.
The Impact of the Decision
The decision has sparked significant debate and concern among educators and students alike. The federal Education Department had requested that states certify that they had removed DEI programs, with the threat of losing federal education funding if they did not comply.
| State | Federal Funding |
|---|---|
| New Jersey | $77 million to Newark Public Schools |
| Illinois | $250 million |
| Pennsylvania | $1.2 billion |
The threat of losing federal funding is particularly concerning for districts like Newark, which rely heavily on Title I funds to fill gaps in their budgets. The loss of these funds could have a disproportionate impact on high-poverty districts, exacerbating existing inequalities.
A Response from the Commissioner
In his letter, Dehmer also questioned the administration’s authority to withhold federal funds on the basis of refusing to submit the certification it requested. He argued that the administration had not defined the terms “certain DEI practices” or “illegal DEI,” and that there were no known federal or New Jersey state laws prohibiting diversity, equity, or inclusion. “We will not be bullied or coerced into removing programs that have been proven to be effective in empowering all students,” Dehmer stated in his letter.
A Statement from the State Education Department
The state education department has also released a statement emphasizing that the state is committed to providing protections that empower all students to realize their full potential. The department noted that it already certifies its compliance with Title VI on an annual basis as part of its grant administration process. blockquote>
“The NJDOE questions USDE’s authority to condition continued receipt of federal funds on the submission of additional certifications. We will continue to work to ensure that all students have access to the resources they need to succeed.”
A Nationwide Response
At least 15 other states have already declined to sign the certification, according to Education Week. The decision by New Jersey and other states to stand firm against the Trump administration’s pressure has sparked a nationwide conversation about the importance of diversity, equity, and inclusion in education. “This decision sends a strong message that diversity, equity, and inclusion are essential components of a successful education system,” said Dr. Maria Rodriguez, a leading education expert.
Locally, Teachers and Students Speak Out
Locally, teachers and students have held protests against the threats of federal cuts. The protests have highlighted the importance of diversity, equity, and inclusion in education, and have emphasized the need for policymakers to prioritize these values. “We need to stand up for our students and our schools,” said one teacher, who wished to remain anonymous.
